Burger King is better than McDonalds. Why? I took my McDonalds-addict girlfriend to Burger King yesterday (how romantic) and she absolutely loved it.
But it's obvious that it's better. Bigger burgers, for starters. The fries aren't coated in salt. And hey, they sell Kinnie! You definitely eat your money's worth. Unlike McDonalds, where you need to eat like 3 burgers to fill yourself up.
And while we're talking about fast food, don't go to Pizza Hut more than once a month. Or a year. Unless you're filthy stinkin' rich. Yesterday I spent money throughout the whole day for food equivalent to one meal at Pizza Hut. Curse those heavenly breadsticks and their price tag.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
uxeee pizza hut rules :P
Ara, I like both for different reasons.
Burger King burgers are more 'classic' in a way. They have the usual grilled patty with the usual vegetables and the usual bun which yes, is delicious.
McDonalds are more experimental. They try new concepts regularly - different chicken burgers with different dressings/buns/added onion and bacon/added herbs etc. Off hand I can think of McChicken Premier, CBO, Chicken Gourmet and McChicken.
So although I tend to prefer Burger King, I never ruled McDonalds out.
Not to mention the desserts - I'd choose McDonalds over Burger King for desserts
The very fact that you said "patty" says so much about what you watch on television :D
I'm not much of a junk food eater, haven'tever been to Burger King and been to McDonalds to eat maybe 4 times?
Pizza hut on the other hand, I lvoe hat place. It takes about 30 mins to order and dleiver a pizza to the flat in Msida. With some Garlic Bread Slices as a Starter followed by a Cheesey Crust Cappriciosa, no Mushrooms, with Pepperoni. Woaw my mouth is watering !
Post a Comment