First off, a happy new year to you. Hope you enjoyed your evening and actually remembered what happened by not getting utterly wasted to the point of having to get escorted by members of the Red Cross (yes Josmar, you wanted an honourable mention in my blog, now you got it).
At lunch today my uncle came up with the argument that we're not really in the year 2009, because technically 2009 years have already passed. We're merely adding days to those 2009 years as this year goes on, so we're in the 2010th year.
I don't exactly know how that's really interesting. Or how it's even a valid argument. I'm not quite sure. I think it's more entertaining to just imagine a wasted Josmar getting escorted by the Red Cross.
EDIT: Okay so Josmar didn't really get wasted to the point of needing Red Cross help (unreliable sources). But still, let's just imagine he did anyway for the lulz.
Thursday, January 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
well this is what I think; today is the first day of the first month of the 2009th revolution the earth made around the sun since Jesus' birth, going towards the 2010th mark.
So it's mistaken to say that 2009 is over, but it would be more correct to say that we're going to complete the 2010th revolution in 12 months
...however on re-reading it, it looks like there's a mistake somewhere... what do you think?
tar red cross lil gary gabru! :G
the calanders started from year 0 and not 1...hence wen the year zero passed year 1 started. so now year 2008 passed and 2009 started. hmm this is confusing...but really who cares. and actually before year 0 was invented as a calender the world was already here. its just used to keep time sooo...i forgot my point
Post a Comment